HomeCompareHogan Assessments vs Knockri

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Hogan Assessments vs Knockri

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Hogan Assessments and Knockri tie at 47.

Hogan Assessments, filed under Assessment, and Knockri, filed under Video interview, tie at 47 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Hogan Assessments leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Knockri 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Hogan Assessments 44, Knockri 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 55% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, Knockri under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHogan AssessmentsKnockri
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSCA
Founded19872017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Hogan Assessments 44 · Knockri 35

    1.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  2. 20% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 50 · Knockri 55

    1.0 weighted points to Knockri

  3. 12% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Hogan Assessments 52 · Knockri 60

    1.0 weighted points to Knockri

  4. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Hogan Assessments 40 · Knockri 35

    0.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  5. 8% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 62 · Knockri 55

    0.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Hogan Assessments 52 · Knockri 55

    0.4 weighted points to Knockri

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Hogan Assessments 36 · Knockri 35

    0.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Hogan Assessments minus Knockri.

CategoryWeightHogan AssessmentsKnockriΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5055-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4435+9+1.6
FRIA Support15%3635+1+0.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5255-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5260-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4035+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6255+7+0.6
Total100%47 (F)47 (F)-+0.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHogan AssessmentsKnockri
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%206Sources on the vendor's own domain365Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Knockri has 41 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Knockri sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 41 for Knockri, across 7 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Knockri last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.