§ The result
Infor Talent Science and Jobma tie at 49.
Infor Talent Science (Assessment) and Jobma (Video interview) tie at 49 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Infor Talent Science leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Jobma 2, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Human Oversight Design, is both the widest raw gap (Infor Talent Science 50, Jobma 60) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 88% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Infor Talent Science
Infor Talent Science is a cloud-based pre-hire behavioral and cognitive assessment platform. It scores candidates against patented machine-learning 'Performance Profiles' built from the behavior and performance data of an employer's successful incumbents, and gives hiring teams fit scores, recommendations and interview questions that are used to rank and route applicants.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
§ The record
Infor Talent Science is filed under Assessment AI, Jobma under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Infor Talent Science | Jobma |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Infor Talent Science 50 · Jobma 60
1.2 weighted points to Jobma
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Infor Talent Science 58 · Jobma 55
0.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
18% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Infor Talent Science 42 · Jobma 40
0.4 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Infor Talent Science 60 · Jobma 62
0.2 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Infor Talent Science 57 · Jobma 56
0.1 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Infor Talent Science 45 · Jobma 44
0.1 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Infor Talent Science minus Jobma.
| Category | Weight | Infor Talent Science | Jobma | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 56 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 44 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 49 (F) | - | -0.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Infor Talent Science | Jobma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Infor Talent Science last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next