Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
JobDiva vs Pulsifi
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
4 points separate Pulsifi and JobDiva.
Pulsifi (Assessment) edges JobDiva (ATS-integrated) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 33 to 29. JobDiva takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for Pulsifi, whose share includes Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Human Oversight Design, is both the widest raw gap (JobDiva 40, Pulsifi 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Pulsifi holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- JobDiva1
- Pulsifi6
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design40 vs 55
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Pulsifi is in scope of
| Record | JobDiva | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2003 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight41% of the movement so far
JobDiva40Pulsifi551.8 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight61% of the movement so far
JobDiva15Pulsifi200.9 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight71% of the movement so far
JobDiva22Pulsifi250.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight80% of the movement so far
JobDiva28Pulsifi300.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight88% of the movement so far
JobDiva42Pulsifi460.3 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight95% of the movement so far
JobDiva38Pulsifi400.3 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
JobDiva30Pulsifi280.2 weighted points to JobDiva
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Pulsifi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 20 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 46 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29F | 33F | -4 | -3.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.