Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
micro1 vs myInterview
micro1
Zara, micro1's LLM-based AI interviewer, runs recorded, adaptive spoken interviews (with optional coding exercises and automated proctoring) and returns per-skill proficiency ratings, soft-skill ratings and a proctoring score; micro1 uses it to certify experts for its own AI-training talent network, and employers can use it through a client portal and API.
Substantial gaps
Screening
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
1 point separates myInterview and micro1.
myInterview holds a 1-point edge over micro1 under rubric v1.0, 37 to 36, across the Video interview and Screening cohorts. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to micro1 and myInterview, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side myInterview holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — micro1 20, myInterview 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 66% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- micro13
- myInterview3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
micro1 is filed under Screening AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | micro1 | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2022 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight37% of the movement so far
micro120myInterview352.7 weighted points to myInterview
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight69% of the movement so far
micro150myInterview382.4 weighted points to micro1
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight82% of the movement so far
micro125myInterview331.0 weighted points to myInterview
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
micro122myInterview250.4 weighted points to myInterview
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight95% of the movement so far
micro145myInterview420.4 weighted points to micro1
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
micro145myInterview400.4 weighted points to micro1
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is micro1 minus myInterview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | micro1 | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 38 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 35 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 42 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 48 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 33 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 36F | 37F | -1 | -0.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | micro1 | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for micro1 and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- micro1 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.