The result

Talview takes the total, Willo takes more of the criteria.

Within the Video interview cohort, Talview edges Willo by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. Willo leads more of the criteria than Talview — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Talview leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Talview. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Talview 50, Willo 38) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 63% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Talview2
  • Willo4
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Article 11 Technical Documentation50 vs 38
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Talview and Willo are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Assessment and Screening.

RecordTalviewWillo
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20122018

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight40% of the movement so far

    Talview50
    Willo38

    2.4 weighted points to Talview

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight63% of the movement so far

    Talview38
    Willo30

    1.4 weighted points to Talview

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight77% of the movement so far

    Talview55
    Willo62

    0.8 weighted points to Willo

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight89% of the movement so far

    Talview48
    Willo53

    0.8 weighted points to Willo

  5. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight97% of the movement so far

    Talview32
    Willo36

    0.5 weighted points to Willo

  6. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Talview52
    Willo54

    0.2 weighted points to Willo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.6.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Talview minus Willo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightTalviewWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5038+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3830+8+1.4
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4853-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3236-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%5254-2-0.2
Total100%42F41F+1+1.6

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightTalviewWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—11—
FRIA Support15%01—01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%116Sources on the vendor's own domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next