§ The result
Talview takes the total, Willo takes more of the criteria.
Within the Video interview cohort, Talview edges Willo by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. Willo leads more of the criteria than Talview — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Talview leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Talview. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Talview 50, Willo 38 — and at a 20% weight it carries 63% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
Talview and Willo are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Assessment and Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Talview | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Talview 50 · Willo 38
2.4 weighted points to Talview
18% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Talview 38 · Willo 30
1.4 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Talview 55 · Willo 62
0.8 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Talview 48 · Willo 53
0.8 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Talview 32 · Willo 36
0.5 weighted points to Willo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Talview 52 · Willo 54
0.2 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Talview minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | Talview | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 38 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 53 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 36 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 54 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 41 (F) | +1 | +1.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Talview | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next