Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cappfinity vs Willo
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
1 point separates Willo and Cappfinity.
Willo holds a 1-point edge over Cappfinity under rubric v1.0, 41 to 40, across the Video interview and Assessment cohorts. Willo leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Human Oversight Design, while Cappfinity leads 3, including FRIA Support. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cappfinity 52, Willo 62 — and at a 12% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage Willo holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Cappfinity3
- Willo4
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design52 vs 62
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Cappfinity is filed under Assessment AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Cappfinity | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | GB |
| Founded | 2005 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight41% of the movement so far
Cappfinity52Willo621.2 weighted points to Willo
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight56% of the movement so far
Cappfinity28Willo250.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight69% of the movement so far
Cappfinity36Willo380.4 weighted points to Willo
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight81% of the movement so far
Cappfinity28Willo300.4 weighted points to Willo
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight90% of the movement so far
Cappfinity38Willo360.2 weighted points to Cappfinity
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
Cappfinity56Willo540.2 weighted points to Cappfinity
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Cappfinity52Willo530.1 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Willo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 38 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 53 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 36 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 54 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 40F | 41F | -1 | -1.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.