§ The result
Harver leads HeroHunt.ai by 26 points.
Harver (Assessment) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing) are 26 points apart under rubric v1.0, 56 for Harver against 30 for HeroHunt.ai. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Harver: Harver is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and HeroHunt.ai on Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Harver 80, HeroHunt.ai 10 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
§ The record
Harver is filed under Assessment AI, HeroHunt.ai under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Harver is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Harver | HeroHunt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | NL | NL |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Harver 80 · HeroHunt.ai 10
12.6 weighted points to Harver
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Harver 65 · HeroHunt.ai 20
9.0 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Harver 55 · HeroHunt.ai 45
1.5 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Harver 40 · HeroHunt.ai 28
1.4 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Harver 35 · HeroHunt.ai 27
1.2 weighted points to Harver
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Harver 60 · HeroHunt.ai 48
1.0 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Harver 50 · HeroHunt.ai 55
0.6 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +26 beside that +26.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harver minus HeroHunt.ai.
| Category | Weight | Harver | HeroHunt.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 20 | +45 | +9.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 10 | +70 | +12.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 27 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 30 (F) | +26 | +26.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harver | HeroHunt.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next