Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireLogic vs Pulsifi
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
HireLogic takes the total, Pulsifi takes more of the criteria.
HireLogic holds a 1-point edge over Pulsifi under rubric v1.0, 34 to 33, across the Video interview and Assessment cohorts. Pulsifi leads more of the criteria, 3 against 2 for HireLogic, yet HireLogic takes Article 11 Technical Documentation, which carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireLogic 42, Pulsifi 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 76% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireLogic2
- Pulsifi3
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation42 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireLogic | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight48% of the movement so far
HireLogic42Pulsifi302.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight66% of the movement so far
HireLogic15Pulsifi200.9 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight83% of the movement so far
HireLogic48Pulsifi550.8 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
HireLogic45Pulsifi400.8 weighted points to HireLogic
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HireLogic45Pulsifi460.1 weighted points to Pulsifi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Pulsifi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 20 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 46 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 33F | +1 | +1.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.